Week 8 NCAA Football Power Rankings

Posted: 17/10/2011 in College Football, Football, NCAAF

(as of October 16, 2011)

1.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/lli.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Louisiana State Tigers (7-0)  LW: (–)

2.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aad.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Alabama Crimson Tide (7-0)  LW: 3 (+1)

3.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oklahoma Sooners (6-0)  LW: 2 (-1)

4.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwo.gif – Wisconsin Badgers (6-0)  LW: 4 (–)

5.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Boise State Broncos (6-0)  LW: 6 (+1)

6.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/sss3.gif – Stanford Cardinal (6-0)  LW: 5 (-1)

7.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ood.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.– Oklahoma State Cowboys (6-0)  LW: 7 (–)

8.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccl.gif – Clemson Tigers (7-0)  LW: 8 (–)

9.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oregon Ducks (5-1)  LW: 9 (–)

10.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aan_4.gif – Arkansas Razorbacks (5-1)  LW: 10 (–)

11.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Nebraska Cornhuskers (5-1)  LW: 13 (+2)

12.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwh.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – West Virginia Mountaineers (5-1)  LW: 16 (+4)

13.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ssi.gif – South Carolina Gamecocks (6-1)  LW: 14 (+1)

14.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/kkb.gif – Kansas State Wildcats (6-0)  LW: 17 (+3)

15.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mml.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Michigan State Spartans (5-1)  LW: 20 (+5)

16.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvd.gif – Virginia Tech Hokies (6-1)  LW: 18 (+2)

17.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmk.gif – Michigan Wolverines (6-1)  LW: 11 (-6)

18.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas A&M Aggies (4-2)  LW: 23 (+5)

19.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-1)  LW: 12 (-7)

20.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/hhe.gif – Houston Cougars (6-0)  LW: 24 (+4)

21.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aar.gif – Auburn Tigers (5-2)  LW: 25 (+4)

22.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/iic2.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Illinois Fighting Illini (6-1)  LW: 15 (-7)

23.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwb.gif – Washington Huskies (5-1)  LW: 27 (+4)

24.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ppb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Penn State Nittany Lions (6-1)  LW: 28 (+4)

25.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aam.gif – Arizona State Sun Devils (5-2)  LW: 19 (-6)

26.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Bulldogs (4-2)  LW: 30 (+4)

27.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnx.gif – Notre Dame Fighting Irish (4-2)  LW: 29 (+2)

28.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/uub.gif – Southern California Trojans (5-1)  LW: 34 (+6)

29.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/ssh2.gif – Southern Methodist Mustangs (5-1)  LW: 35 (+6)

30.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tth.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Longhorns (4-2)  LW: 22 (-8)

31.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/rrd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Rutgers Scarlet Knights (5-1)  LW: 38 (+7)

32.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbb.gif – Baylor Bears (4-2)  LW: 21 (-11)

33.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/sso.gif – Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles (5-1)  LW: 37 (+4)

34.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Cincinnati Bearcats (4-1)  LW: 40 (+6)

35.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnl.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – North Carolina Tar Heels (5-2)  LW: 31 (-4)

36.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Virginia Cavaliers (4-2)  LW: NR (–)

37.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttb.gif Temple Owls (5-2)  LW: NR (–)

38.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwa.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Wake Forest Demon Deacons (4-2)  LW: 33 (-5)

39.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tta.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Christian Horned Frogs (4-2)  LW: 39 (–)

40.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/oob.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Ohio State Buckeyes (4-3)  LW: NR (–)

– Steve

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s