NFL Power Rankings: Week 10

Posted: 16/11/2011 in Football, NFL

NFL Power Rankings: Week 10

1. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/gnb.gif Green Bay Packers (9-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sfo.gif San Francisco 49ers (8-1)  LW: 2 (–)

3. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/hou.gif Houston Texans (7-3)  LW: 5 (+2)

4. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nor.gif New Orleans Saints (7-3)  LW: 6 (+2)

5. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/pit.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Pittsburgh Steelers (7-3)  LW: 8 (+3)

6. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nwe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. New England Patriots (6-3)  LW: 12 (+6)

7. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/bal.gif Baltimore Ravens (6-3)  LW: 3 (-4)

8. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/chi.gif Chicago Bears (6-3)  LW: 14 (+6)

9. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/det.gif Detroit Lions (6-3)  LW: 4 (-5)

10. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cin.gif Cincinnati Bengals (6-3)  LW: 7 (-3)

11. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyg.gif New York Giants (6-3)  LW: 9 (-2)

12. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/dal.gif Dallas Cowboys (5-4)  LW: 17 (+5)

13. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/atl.gif Atlanta Falcons (5-4)  LW: 13 ()

14. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyj.gif New York Jets (5-4)  LW: 10 (-4)

15. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ten.gif Tennessee Titans (5-4)  LW: 18 (+3)

16. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/oak.gif Oakland Raiders (5-4)  LW: 21 (+5)

17. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/buf.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Buffalo Bills (5-3)  LW: 11 (-6)

18. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sdg.gif San Diego Chargers (4-5)  LW: 15 (-3)

19. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/phi.gif Philadelphia Eagles (3-6)  LW: 16 (-3)

20. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/den.gif Denver Broncos (4-5)  LW: 26 (+6)

21. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/tam.gif Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-5)  LW: 19 (-2)

22. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/jac.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Jacksonville Jaguars (3-6)  LW: 28 (+6)

23. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/kan.gif Kansas City Chiefs (4-5)  LW: 25 (+2)

24. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sea.gif Seattle Seahawks (3-6)  LW: 29 (+5)

25. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ari.gif Arizona Cardinals (3-6)  LW: 27 (+2)

26. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cle.gif Cleveland Browns (3-6)  LW: 20 (-6)

27. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/was.gif Washington Redskins (3-6)  LW: 22 (-5)

28. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/mia.gif Miami Dolphins (2-7)  LW: 30 (+2)

29. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/car.gif Carolina Panthers (2-7)  LW: 24 (-5)

30. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/min.gif Minnesota Vikings (2-7)  LW: 23 (-7)

31. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/stl.gif St. Louis Rams (2-7)  LW: 31 (–)

32. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ind.gif Indianapolis Colts (0-10)  LW: 32 (–)

– Steve

Advertisements

NCAA Football Power Rankings: Week 12

(as of November 13, 2011)

1.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/lli.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Louisiana State Tigers (10-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ood.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.– Oklahoma State Cowboys (10-0)  LW: 2 (–)

3.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aad.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Alabama Crimson Tide (9-1)  LW: 4 (+1)

4.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oregon Ducks (9-1)  LW: 6 (+2)

5.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oklahoma Sooners (8-1)  LW: 7 (+2)

6.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aan_4.gif – Arkansas Razorbacks (9-1)  LW: 8 (+2)

7.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccl.gif – Clemson Tigers (9-1)  LW: 9 (+2)

8.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/sss3.gif – Stanford Cardinal (9-1)  LW: 3 (-5)

9.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvd.gif – Virginia Tech Hokies (9-1)  LW: 10 (+1)

10.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/hhe.gif – Houston Cougars (10-0)  LW: 11 (+1)

11.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Boise State Broncos (8-1)  LW: 5 (-6)

12.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mml.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Michigan State Spartans (8-2)  LW: 13 (+1)

13.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Bulldogs (8-2)  LW: 16 (+3)

14.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ssi.gif – South Carolina Gamecocks (8-2)  LW: 14 (–)

15.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwo.gif – Wisconsin Badgers (8-2)  LW: 15 (–)

16.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Nebraska Cornhuskers (8-2)  LW: 17 (+1)

17.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/kkb.gif – Kansas State Wildcats (8-2)  LW: 18 (+1)

18.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmk.gif – Michigan Wolverines (8-2)  LW: 21 (+3)

19.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tta.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Christian Horned Frogs (8-2)  LW: 27 (+6)

20.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ppb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Penn State Nittany Lions (8-2)  LW: 12 (-8)

21.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/sso.gif – Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles (9-1)  LW: 24 (+3)

22.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/uub.gif – Southern California Trojans (8-2)  LW: 23 (+1)

23.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ffc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Florida State Seminoles (7-3) LW: 29  (+6)

24.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnx.gif – Notre Dame Fighting Irish (7-3) LW: 30  (+6)

25.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (7-3)  LW: 19 (-6)

26.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwh.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – West Virginia Mountaineers (7-3)  LW: 33 (+7)

27.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbb.gif – Baylor Bears (6-3)  LW: 35 (+8)

28.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Cincinnati Bearcats (7-2)  LW: 22 (-6)

29.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Virginia Cavaliers (7-3) LW: 37 (+8)

30.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tth.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Longhorns (6-3)  LW: 20 (-10)

31.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttt.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Tulsa Golden Hurricane (7-3) LW: 39 (+8)

32.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/rrd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Rutgers Scarlet Knights (7-3)  LW: 36 (+4)

33.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aar.gif – Auburn Tigers (6-4)  LW: 25 (-8)

34.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aam.gif – Arizona State Sun Devils (6-4)  LW: 28 (-6)

35.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwb.gif – Washington Huskies (6-4)  LW: 31 (-4)

36.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas A&M Aggies (5-5)  LW: 34 (-2)

37.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aap_2.gif – Arkansas State Red Wolves (8-2) LW: 40 (+3)

38.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaab/teams/20080123/80x60/mbh.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Missouri Tigers (5-5) LW: NR  (–)

39.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbi.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – BYU Cougars (7-3) LW: NR  (–)

40.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/uuc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Utah Utes (6-4) LW: NR  (–)

– Steve

NFL Power Rankings: Week 9

Posted: 09/11/2011 in Football, NFL

NFL Power Rankings: Week 9

1. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/gnb.gif Green Bay Packers (8-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sfo.gif San Francisco 49ers (7-1)  LW: 2 (–)

3. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/bal.gif Baltimore Ravens (6-2)  LW: 4 (+1)

4. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/det.gif Detroit Lions (6-2)  LW: 3 (-1)

5. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/hou.gif Houston Texans (6-3)  LW: 8 (+3)

6. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nor.gif New Orleans Saints (6-3)  LW: 6 (–)

7. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cin.gif Cincinnati Bengals (6-2)  LW: 10 (+3)

8. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/pit.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Pittsburgh Steelers (6-3)  LW: 7 (-1)

9. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyg.gif New York Giants (6-2)  LW: 11 (+2)

10. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyj.gif New York Jets (5-3)  LW: 13 (+3)

11. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/buf.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Buffalo Bills (5-3)  LW: 9 (-2)

12. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nwe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. New England Patriots (5-3)  LW: 5 (-7)

13. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/atl.gif Atlanta Falcons (5-3)  LW: 20 (+7)

14. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/chi.gif Chicago Bears (5-3)  LW: 14 (–)

15. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sdg.gif San Diego Chargers (4-4)  LW: 12 (-3)

16. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/phi.gif Philadelphia Eagles (3-5)  LW: 17 (+1)

17. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/dal.gif Dallas Cowboys (4-4)  LW: 15 (-2)

18. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ten.gif Tennessee Titans (4-4)  LW: 23 (+5)

19. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/tam.gif Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-4)  LW: 19 (–)

20. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cle.gif Cleveland Browns (3-5)  LW: 16 (-4)

21. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/oak.gif Oakland Raiders (4-4)  LW: 21 (–)

22. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/was.gif Washington Redskins (3-5)  LW: 18 (-4)

23. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/min.gif Minnesota Vikings (2-6)  LW: 28 (+5)

24. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/car.gif Carolina Panthers (2-6)  LW: 22 (-2)

25. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/kan.gif Kansas City Chiefs (4-4)  LW: 25 (–)

26. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/den.gif Denver Broncos (3-5)  LW: 27 (+1

27. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ari.gif Arizona Cardinals (2-6)  LW: 29 (+2)

28. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/jac.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Jacksonville Jaguars (2-6)  LW: 24 (-4)

29. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sea.gif Seattle Seahawks (2-6)  LW: 26 (-3)

30. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/mia.gif Miami Dolphins (1-7)  LW: 30 (–)

31. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/stl.gif St. Louis Rams (1-7)  LW: 31 (–)

32. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ind.gif Indianapolis Colts (0-9)  LW: 32 (–)

– Steve

NCAA Football Power Rankings: Week 11

(as of October 30, 2011)

1.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/lli.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Louisiana State Tigers (9-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ood.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.– Oklahoma State Cowboys (9-0)  LW: 4 (+2)

3.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/sss3.gif – Stanford Cardinal (9-0)  LW: 3 (+3)

4.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aad.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Alabama Crimson Tide (8-1)  LW: 2 (-2)

5.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Boise State Broncos (8-0)  LW: 5 ()

6.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oregon Ducks (8-1)  LW: 7 (+1)

7.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oklahoma Sooners (8-1)  LW: 10 (+3)

8.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aan_4.gif – Arkansas Razorbacks (8-1)  LW: 8 (–)

9.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccl.gif – Clemson Tigers (8-1)  LW: 8 (-3)

10.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvd.gif – Virginia Tech Hokies (8-1)  LW: 15 (+5)

11.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/hhe.gif – Houston Cougars (9-0)  LW: 18 (+7)

12.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ppb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Penn State Nittany Lions (8-1)  LW: 19 (+7)

13.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mml.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Michigan State Spartans (7-2)  LW: 9 (-4)

14.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ssi.gif – South Carolina Gamecocks (7-2)  LW: 14 (–)

15.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwo.gif – Wisconsin Badgers (7-2)  LW: 12 (-3)

16.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Bulldogs (7-2)  LW: 22 (+6)

17.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Nebraska Cornhuskers (7-2)  LW: 13 (-4)

18.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/kkb.gif – Kansas State Wildcats (7-2)  LW: 11 (-7)

19.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (7-2)  LW: 29 (+10)

20.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tth.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Longhorns (6-2)  LW: 28 (+8)

21.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmk.gif – Michigan Wolverines (7-2)  LW: 17 (-4)

22.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Cincinnati Bearcats (7-1)  LW: 24 (+2)

23.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/uub.gif – Southern California Trojans (7-2)  LW: 23 (–)

24.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/sso.gif – Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles (8-1)  LW: 26 (+2)

25.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aar.gif – Auburn Tigers (6-3)  LW: 30 (+5)

26.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tta.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Christian Horned Frogs (7-2)  LW: 32 (+6)

27.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/oob.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Ohio State Buckeyes (6-3)  LW: NR (–)

28.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aam.gif – Arizona State Sun Devils (6-3)  LW: 20 (-8)

29.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ffc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Florida State Seminoles (6-3) LW: NR  (–)

30.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnx.gif – Notre Dame Fighting Irish (6-3) LW: NR  (–)

31.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwb.gif – Washington Huskies (6-3)  LW: 31 (–)

32.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/iig.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Iowa Hawkeyes (6-3) LW: 35  (+3)

33.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwh.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – West Virginia Mountaineers (6-3)  LW: 25 (-8)

34.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas A&M Aggies (5-4)  LW: 16 (-18)

35.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbb.gif – Baylor Bears (5-3)  LW: 27 (-8)

36.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/rrd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Rutgers Scarlet Knights (6-3)  LW: 40 (+4)

37.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Virginia Cavaliers (6-3) LW: NR (–)

38.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmi.gif – Miami (FL) Hurricanes (5-4) LW: 38  (–)

39.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttt.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Tulsa Golden Hurricane (6-3) LW: NR (–)

40.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aap_2.gif – Arkansas State Red Wolves (7-2) LW: NR (–) 

– Steve

NFL Power Rankings: Week 7

Posted: 25/10/2011 in Football, NFL

NFL Power Rankings: Week 7

1. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/gnb.gif Green Bay Packers (7-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sfo.gif San Francisco 49ers (5-1)  LW: 3 (+1)

3. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/det.gif Detroit Lions (5-2)  LW: 4(+1)

4. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/bal.gif Baltimore Ravens (4-2)  LW: 2 (-2)

5. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nwe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. New England Patriots (5-1)  LW: 5 ()

6. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nor.gif New Orleans Saints (5-2)  LW: 10 (+4)

7. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/pit.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Pittsburgh Steelers (5-2)  LW: 7 ()

8. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/hou.gif Houston Texans (4-3)  LW: 12 (+4)

9. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/buf.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Buffalo Bills (4-2)  LW: 8 (-1)

10. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cin.gif Cincinnati Bengals (4-2)  LW: 9 (-1)

11. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyg.gif New York Giants (4-2)  LW: 11 ()

12. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sdg.gif San Diego Chargers (4-2)  LW: 6 (-6)

13. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyj.gif New York Jets (4-3)  LW: 14 (+1)

14. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/chi.gif Chicago Bears (4-3)  LW: 19 (+5)

15. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/dal.gif Dallas Cowboys (3-3)  LW: 21 (+6)

16. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cle.gif Cleveland Browns (3-3)  LW: 22 (+6)

17. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/phi.gif Philadelphia Eagles (2-4)  LW: 18 (+1)

18. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/was.gif Washington Redskins (3-3)  LW: 13 (-5)

19. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/tam.gif Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-3)  LW: 17 (-2)

20. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/atl.gif Atlanta Falcons (4-3)  LW: 20 ()

21. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/oak.gif Oakland Raiders (4-3)  LW: 15 (-6)

22. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/car.gif Carolina Panthers (2-5)  LW: 26 (+4)

23. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ten.gif Tennessee Titans (3-3)  LW: 16 (-7)

24. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/jac.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Jacksonville Jaguars (2-5)  LW: 28 (+4)

25. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/kan.gif Kansas City Chiefs (3-3)  LW: 27 (+2)

26. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sea.gif Seattle Seahawks (2-4)  LW: 23 (-3)

27. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/den.gif Denver Broncos (2-4)  LW: 29 (+2)

28. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/min.gif Minnesota Vikings (1-6)  LW: 24 (-4)

29. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ari.gif Arizona Cardinals (1-5)  LW: 25 (-4)

30. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/mia.gif Miami Dolphins (0-6)  LW: 30 (–)

31. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/stl.gif St. Louis Rams (0-6)  LW: 32 (+1)

32. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ind.gif Indianapolis Colts (0-7)  LW: 31 (-1)

– Steve

NCAA Football Power Rankings: Week 9

(as of October 16, 2011)

1.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/lli.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Louisiana State Tigers (8-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aad.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Alabama Crimson Tide (8-0)  LW: 2 ()

3.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/sss3.gif – Stanford Cardinal (7-0)  LW: 6 (+3)

4.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ood.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.– Oklahoma State Cowboys (7-0)  LW: 7 (+3)

5.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Boise State Broncos (7-0)  LW: 5 ()

6.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccl.gif – Clemson Tigers (8-0)  LW: 8 (+2)

7.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oregon Ducks (6-1)  LW: 9 (+2)

8.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/aan_4.gif – Arkansas Razorbacks (6-1)  LW: 10 (+2)

9.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mml.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Michigan State Spartans (6-1)  LW: 15 (+6)

10.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ooc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Oklahoma Sooners (6-1)  LW: 3 (-7)

11.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/kkb.gif – Kansas State Wildcats (7-0)  LW: 14 (+3)

12.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwo.gif – Wisconsin Badgers (6-1)  LW: 4 (-8)

13.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/nnd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Nebraska Cornhuskers (6-1)  LW: 11 (-2)

14.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ssi.gif – South Carolina Gamecocks (6-1)  LW: 13 (-1)

15.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/vvd.gif – Virginia Tech Hokies (7-1)  LW: 16 (+1)

16.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ttj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas A&M Aggies (5-2)  LW: 18 (+2)

17.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmk.gif – Michigan Wolverines (6-1)  LW: 17 ()

18.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/hhe.gif – Houston Cougars (7-0)  LW: 20 (+2)

19.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ppb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Penn State Nittany Lions (7-1)  LW: 24 (+5)

20.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aam.gif – Arizona State Sun Devils (5-2)  LW: 25 (+5)

21.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tto.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Tech Red Raiders (5-2) LW: NR (–)

22.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggb.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Bulldogs (5-2)  LW: 26 (+4)

23.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/uub.gif – Southern California Trojans (6-1)  LW: 28 (+5)

24.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ccj.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Cincinnati Bearcats (6-1)  LW: 34 (+10)

25.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwh.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – West Virginia Mountaineers (5-2)  LW: 12 (-13)

26.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/sso.gif – Southern Mississippi Golden Eagles (6-1)  LW: 33 (+7)

27.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbb.gif – Baylor Bears (4-2)  LW: 32 (+5)

28.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tth.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Longhorns (4-2)  LW: 30 (+2)

29.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/ggc.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (6-2)  LW: 19 (-10)

30.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/aar.gif – Auburn Tigers (5-3)  LW: 21 (-9)

31.) https://i1.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwb.gif – Washington Huskies (5-2)  LW: 22 (-8)

32.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/tta.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Texas Christian Horned Frogs (5-2)  LW: 39 (+7)

33.) //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/ssw.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Syracuse Orange (5-2) LW: NR (–)

34.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/iic2.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Illinois Fighting Illini (6-2)  LW: 22 (-12)

35.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/iig.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Iowa Hawkeyes (5-2) LW: NR  (–)

36.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/bbi.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Brigham Young Cougars (6-2) LW: NR  (–)

37.) https://i2.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/1/80x60/ssh2.gif – Southern Methodist Mustangs (5-2)  LW: 29 (-8)

38.) https://i0.wp.com/l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/mmi.gif – Miami (FL) Hurricanes (4-3) LW: NR  (–)

39.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/wwa.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Wake Forest Demon Deacons (5-2)  LW: 38 (-1)

40.) //l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sp/v/ncaaf/teams/20080123/80x60/rrd.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. – Rutgers Scarlet Knights (5-2)  LW: 31 (-9)

– Steve

NFL Power Rankings: Week 6

Posted: 18/10/2011 in Football, NFL

NFL Power Rankings: Week 6

1. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/gnb.gif Green Bay Packers (6-0)  LW: 1 (–)

2. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/bal.gif Baltimore Ravens (4-1)  LW: 4 (+2)

3. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sfo.gif San Francisco 49ers (5-1)  LW: 6 (+3)

4. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/det.gif Detroit Lions (5-1)  LW: 2 (-2)

5. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nwe.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. New England Patriots (5-1)  LW: 3 (-2)

6. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sdg.gif San Diego Chargers (4-1)  LW: 8 (+2)

7. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/pit.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Pittsburgh Steelers (4-2)  LW: 11 (+4)

8. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/buf.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Buffalo Bills (4-2)  LW: 5 (-3)

9. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cin.gif Cincinnati Bengals (4-2)  LW: 12 (+3)

10. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nor.gif New Orleans Saints (4-2)  LW: 7 (-3)

11. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyg.gif New York Giants (4-2)  LW: 15 (+4)

12. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/hou.gif Houston Texans (3-3)  LW: 9 (-3)

13. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/was.gif Washington Redskins (3-2)  LW: 10 (-3)

14. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/nyj.gif New York Jets (3-3)  LW: 18 (+4)

15. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/oak.gif Oakland Raiders (4-2)  LW: 13 (-2)

16. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ten.gif Tennessee Titans (3-2)  LW: 14 (-2)

17. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/tam.gif Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-2)  LW: 19 (+2)

18. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/phi.gif Philadelphia Eagles (2-4)  LW: 20 (+2)

19. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/chi.gif Chicago Bears (3-3)  LW: 23 (+5)

20. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/atl.gif Atlanta Falcons (3-3)  LW: 25 (+5)

21. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/dal.gif Dallas Cowboys (2-3)  LW: 16 (-5)

22. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/cle.gif Cleveland Browns (2-3)  LW: 17 (-5)

23. https://i2.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/sea.gif Seattle Seahawks (2-3)  LW: 24 (+1)

24. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/min.gif Minnesota Vikings (1-5)  LW: 22 (-2)

25. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ari.gif Arizona Cardinals (1-4)  LW: 26 (+1)

26. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/car.gif Carolina Panthers (1-5)  LW: 21 (-5)

27. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/kan.gif Kansas City Chiefs (2-3)  LW: 29 (+2)

28. //us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/jac.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Jacksonville Jaguars (1-5)  LW: 27 (-1)

29. https://i0.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/den.gif Denver Broncos (1-4)  LW: 28 (-1)

30. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/mia.gif Miami Dolphins (0-5)  LW: 30 (–)

31. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/ind.gif Indianapolis Colts (0-6)  LW: 31 (–)

32. https://i1.wp.com/us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sp/v/nfl/teams/1/80x60/stl.gif St. Louis Rams (0-5)  LW: 32 (–)

– Steve